Skip to content

06Legal

Find the clause. Keep the judgment.

Matters drown teams in contracts, filings, and email. We engineer document intelligence and research assistants that retrieve, extract, and draft with citations — so lawyers and advisors review work, they do not re-key it. Professional judgment stays with the professional.

6
capabilities
4
delivery stages
4
system layers
Two attorneys working through folders in a quiet law library

Architecture

A matter architecture that respects the wall

Legal AI that mixes clients is a malpractice event waiting for a demo. We isolate by matter, ground every answer in retrieved text, and keep a human on anything that leaves the firm.

Why it matters

Why professional services cannot use generic AI

A fluent answer without a source is worse than a slow associate. The system has to show its work.

  • Grounded in the file

    Answers cite the clause, the exhibit, or the opinion. If it is not in the corpus, the system says so.

  • Matter isolation

    Indexes and prompts never cross ethical walls. Access follows the same rules as the DMS.

  • Review as the product

    The output is a work product the professional can stand behind — not a chat transcript.

How it works

Retrieve, analyze, and review

  1. 01

    Retrieve

    Search the matter, the precedent set, and the research corpus with walls intact.

  2. 02

    Analyze

    Extract clauses, dates, parties, and risks into structures a reviewer can scan.

  3. 03

    Review

    Drafts and memos arrive with citations. Nothing client-facing ships without a person.

Hands turning through a thick document on a dark wood desk

In production

What production legal AI actually does

How the system behaves when it is live — not in a demo.

  • 01

    How it works

    The corpus is the source of truth. Generation is a drafting aid on top of it.

    • Retrieves passages under matter and ethical-wall rules.
    • Extracts structure or drafts with citations back to those passages.
    • Hands the packet to a reviewer in Word, the DMS, or the matter workspace.
  • 02

    Why it is different

    This is not a public chatbot pointed at confidential files.

    • No answer without a retrievable source — or an explicit ‘not in file’.
    • Client-matter isolation tested, not promised.
    • High-stakes outputs are blocked from send until review.
  • 03

    Why it matters

    Turnaround drops without lowering the professional standard.

    • Due diligence and contract review scale with the pile, not headcount.
    • Research starts from the file, not a blank search bar.
    • Clients get faster work with a trail you can defend.

The challenge

Where legal and advisory work stalls

Document intelligence and knowledge assistants that turn dense case files, contracts, and research into fast, searchable answers.

  • 01

    Volume of unstructured text

    Contracts, productions, and email are the job. Reading them linearly is not a strategy.

  • 02

    Knowledge trapped in matters

    The answer exists in last year’s deal file. Nobody can find it without the partner who ran it.

  • 03

    Deadline compression

    Diligence, filings, and client questions still land on Friday. The system has to be safe at speed.

  • 04

    Confidentiality

    One leaked index across clients and the tool is done. Isolation is the product.

Put it to work

What we build for Legal

Work product systems we build for firms and legal teams — always with a reviewer in the loop.

  • Contract analysis

    Clause extraction, deviation detection, and playbook comparison for review, not auto-sign.

    • Clauses
    • Deviations
    • Playbooks
  • Matter research assistants

    Question-answering over the file and approved research sources, with citations.

    • Citations
    • Memos
    • Sources
  • Due diligence automation

    Document sets clustered, tagged, and summarized into issue lists a lead can prioritize.

    • Issue lists
    • Tags
    • Packets
  • Drafting assist

    First drafts from templates and retrieved clauses — never sent without counsel review.

    • Drafts
    • Templates
    • Redlines
  • Compliance tracking

    Obligation and deadline extraction with owners — integrated to the matter, not a side spreadsheet.

    • Obligations
    • Dates
    • Owners

Legal

The work Legal teams run

Document intelligence and knowledge assistants that turn dense case files, contracts, and research into fast, searchable answers.

  • 01

    Document Intelligence

  • 02

    Contract Analysis

  • 03

    Case Research Assistants

  • 04

    Compliance Tracking

  • 05

    Legal Document Drafting Automation

  • 06

    Due Diligence Automation

  • 07

    Client Intake Systems

  • 08

    Regulatory Change Monitoring

  • 09

    Billing & Time Tracking Automation

  • 10

    Knowledge Base Search

  • Research

    The file, searchable

    Matter-aware retrieval with citations over DMS, email, and research sets.

  • Practice ops

    Intake and deadlines that do not slip

    Client intake, conflicts-adjacent routing, and obligation tracking with owners.

  • Client products

    A tool you can put in front of clients

    When the firm productizes a workflow, tenancy and review stay in the architecture.

  • DMS & PMS

    Intelligence on the repository you have

    Connectors to iManage-class, NetDocuments-class, and practice systems — no rip-and-replace.

Show the source or stay silent

Work product a partner can sign

We optimize for review speed, not for fluency. Every extraction and draft points at a passage. If the model is unsure, it flags the gap instead of filling it with confident fiction.

  • Citations required on generated analysis
  • Ethical-wall and matter isolation in the index
  • Human sign-off before anything leaves the firm
An attorney walking a sunlit library aisle

System flow

How we engineer for legal & professional services

  1. Corpus & workflows
  2. Retrieval & analysis
  3. Human-in-the-loop
  4. Secure delivery
  5. Audit & refine

The outcome

Dense information turned into searchable, actionable knowledge — without sacrificing professional judgment.

What changes for the teams that run this work every day.

  • Linear reading of every page

    Issue lists with cited passages

  • Precedent in someone’s head

    Walled, searchable firm knowledge

  • Drafts from a blank page

    Template-and-clause first drafts for review

Under the hood

Industry-specific AI / ML

RAG and NLP over matters, contracts, and research — citation-grounded, review-ready.

  • 01

    Clause extraction and structured outputs for review

  • 02

    Matter-aware research assistants with grounded citations

  • 03

    Due diligence acceleration over document sets

  • 04

    Semantic search across precedents and internal memos

Production & governance

  • 01

    Human-in-the-loop on high-stakes outputs

  • 02

    Client-matter isolation and ethical-wall access patterns

  • 03

    Audit logs of queries and drafts

  • 04

    Evaluation on representative samples before rollout

How we deliver

A clear path from first conversation to production

  1. 01

    Scope the work product

    Name the documents, the reviewer, and what must never auto-send.

  2. 02

    Encode the walls

    Matter, client, and ethical-wall rules in the index — tested with adversarial queries.

  3. 03

    Evaluate on real files

    Precision on extraction and citation against matters the practice already closed.

  4. 04

    Land in the workflow

    Word, DMS, or matter workspace — then audit logs and a review SLA.

Technology

Tools and platforms we work with

We choose the simplest stack that fits the constraint — and work in yours where you already have one.

Python

FastAPI

PostgreSQL

OpenAI

Anthropic

LangChain

LlamaIndex

Pinecone

AWS

Docker

Engagement outcome

What you receive

  • Matter-isolated retrieval and extraction services
  • Review workflow for drafts and analysis
  • Citation and ‘not in file’ behavior
  • Audit logging of queries and generations
  • Runbook for knowledge, IT, and practice leads

FAQ

Questions we hear in this sector

Straight answers about how we work — without invented case results.

Will this send a client letter on its own?

No. Client-facing and filing-bound outputs require a named reviewer. The system drafts and cites; counsel decides.

How do you keep matters from leaking?

Indexes, prompts, and logs are scoped to client-matter permissions. We test with queries that should fail — not only ones that should succeed.

Can it use public case law and our internal files together?

Yes, as separate corpora with clear source labels. Internal files never train a public model, and answers show which corpus they came from.

What about privilege?

Access follows your existing privilege and ethical-wall rules. We do not create a back door for ‘helpful’ cross-matter search.

Ready to engineer this for Legal?

Tell us about the operation, the constraint, and what production has to look like. We'll come back with an honest first increment — not a generic AI pitch.